Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed
×

BREAKING: Solicitor General asks Supreme Court for time to participate in Prop 8 argument

Marriage equality Marriage Equality Trials Prop 8 trial

By Scottie Thomaston

The Solicitor General of the United States, who filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court yesterday in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Prop 8 case, has also filed a request with the Court to have time to argue in the case along with the plaintiffs’ lawyers, Ted Olson and David Boies, and the opposing side’s Charles Cooper.

The docket page for the case has this entry:

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

The government asks for ten minutes of argument time. The same-sex couples who are plaintiffs challenging the law have said, according to the filing, they would give up ten minutes of their argument time.

The motion notes that the special circumstances of this case warrant the government’s participation in the case: namely that the question of the level of judicial scrutiny that should be applied to laws targeting gays and lesbians as a class has not yet been decided by the Court. The filing also points out that the government’s position on the question is “unique”. The government’s brief in the case suggested that heightened judicial scrutiny applies and that when Prop 8 is viewed through that lens the reasons given for the amendment are not enough to sustain the law.

The brief also pointed to California’s specific circumstances as another reason the amendment fails heightened scrutiny. California treats same-sex and opposite-sex couples the same except with regard to the label of marriage, which is now only applied to opposite-sex couples. California’s laws allow “everything but marriage” (including adoption and joint tax filings and the like) for same-sex couples.

The Solicitor General’s request for more time also points out that some of the same arguments were raised in the challenge to Section 3 of DOMA, United States v. Windsor, so the Court’s approach to those issues are important to the government.

The filing; h/t Kathleen

Perry: Motion of Solicitor General by EqualityCaseFiles

7 Comments Leave a Comment

  • 1. Box Turtle Bulletin &raqu&hellip  |  March 1, 2013 at 9:29 am

    [...] The blog Equality On Trial noticed this entry on the Supreme Court docket page for Hollingsworth v. Perry: The docket page for the case has this entry: [...]

  • 2. Overview: Supreme Court S&hellip  |  March 1, 2013 at 12:20 pm

    [...] While the brief notes that seven other states – Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island – have similar domestic-partnership laws, Verrilli did not ask for the court to rule on them. However, Attorney General Eric Holder suggested a more expansive consideration in a statement: “In our filing today in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the government seeks to vindicate the defining constitutional ideal of equal treatment under the law.  Throughout history, we have seen the unjust consequences of decisions and policies rooted in discrimination. The issues before the Supreme Court in this case and the Defense of Marriage Act case are not just important to the tens of thousands Americans who are being denied equal benefits and rights under our laws, but to our Nation as a whole.”  Verrilli has asked the court for permission to join in oral arguments. [...]

  • 3. Scottie Thomaston: Solici&hellip  |  March 1, 2013 at 3:35 pm

    [...] Scottie Thomaston is a contributor at Courage Campaign Institute’s EqualityOnTrial.com, where this piece originally appeared. [...]

  • 4. Scottie Thomaston: Solici&hellip  |  March 1, 2013 at 4:50 pm

    [...] Scottie Thomaston is a contributor at Courage Campaign Institute’s EqualityOnTrial.com, where this piece originally appeared. [...]

  • 5. Obama Administration Asks&hellip  |  March 2, 2013 at 7:21 am

    [...] to Equality on Trial, the government has filed a motion requesting ten minutes of argument [...]

  • 6. Equality On Trial »&hellip  |  March 5, 2013 at 11:48 am

    [...] the DOMA case (110 minutes instead of the usual 60) we are still waiting on the Court to act on the Solicitor General’s request for time to argue in the Prop 8 [...]

  • 7. Dishwashers in Brookfield  |  June 18, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    Hello, i feel that i noticed you visited my blog thus i came to go back
    the want?.I am attempting to in finding issues to enhance my website!
    I assume its good enough to make use of a few of your ideas!
    !

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required), (Hidden)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL  |  RSS feed for comments on this post.

Having technical problems? E-mail equalityontrial AT couragecampaign DOT org for assistance!