Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed
×

National Organization for Marriage files amicus brief in United States v. Windsor

DOMA trials

By Scottie Thomaston

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) filed an amicus curiae brief United States v. Windsor, the case challenging Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, in support of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) and in defense of Section 3 of DOMA.

Their brief in Windsor is largely focused on the Tenth Amendment arguments raised mostly in Massachusetts v. Department of Health and Human Services, decided by the First Circuit Court of Appeals (consolidated with Gill v. Office of Personnel Management.) The brief also focus on Congress’ ability to define its own terms for federal purposes. In their summary of the argument, they discuss the longstanding use of federal definitions in different contexts and then write:

Interestingly, in 2011 and 2012, one of the public policy organizations bringing this case publicly supported federal legislation that would in one case define marriage for federal purposes and, in another, create a new marriage-like legal status in federal law. This suggests that what they and other opponents of DOMA find offensive is not the consistent practice of Congress defining the terms it uses in the law but rather the definition chosen in this instance. That is an objection appropriately lodged with Congress itself rather than the federal courts.

There’s more below the fold…

The laws referenced seem to be the Respect for Marriage Act (to repeal DOMA) and the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act to “provide the same family benefits to lesbian and gay federal civilian employees as are already provided to employees with different-sex spouses.”

They write that lower courts are “confused” about whether there’s a constitutional mandate for Congress to use state definitions and:

This Court should correct that confusion and uphold the longstanding Congressional practice of defining the terms it uses when it enacts law.

In terms of the argument that DOMA intrudes into what is considered to be a state’s prerogative:

When DOMA was enacted in 1996, no state had redefined marriage to include same-sex unions, so Congress could hardly have meant to “reexamine” non-existent same-sex marriage laws. Similarly, although a number of states have redefined marriage since its passage, DOMA does not require any examination or “intrusion” into those state definitions. Rather, it avoids doing so by enacting a simple statement of the how the term “marriage” will be used in federal statutes, regardless of the variety of state definitions that might be enacted.

And further on the Tenth Amendment:

In enacting DOMA, Congress has not infringed upon the powers of any state to regulate matters of family law. Indeed, since DOMA was adopted, a handful of states have adopted definitions of marriage that differ from the definition in DOMA.

They write that deferring to state laws would “radically transform” principles of federalism:

Specifically relevant here, there has never been a special carve-out that requires Congress to defer to state laws on domestic relations and marriage when federal statutes intersect with them. To announce such a carve-out now would be to radically transform the jurisprudence of federalism that has properly prevailed for over two centuries, at a time when the intersection between federal and state laws on domestic relations has dramatically increased.

They then list and describe several areas in which Congress has defined ‘domestic relations’ including immigration, land grants, military benefits, federal pension regulations, the census, copyright, bankruptcy, and taxes. They write that:

In sum, as these compelling and multifarious examples show, it is beyond cavil that Congress has the exclusive prerogative to define terms used in federal law and that this prerogative undoubtedly extends to laws implicating domestic relations and marriage. This near truism, although vociferously and conveniently opposed by Plaintiff here, has actually been embraced in previous bills proposed by proponents of same-sex marriage. At least two of these bills, which would legislatively accomplish Plaintiff’s objectives here, are predicated upon the central belief that Congress emphatically
does have a role to play in marriage and domestic relations.

They write that Congress has involved itself in defining marriage and domestic relations for federal law purposes for centuries.

And last, they argue that accepting this theory would “potentially unsettle” all areas of federal law. They suggest:

Simply put, Plaintiff’s argument that Congress lacks the authority to specify what it means when it enacts law could not be more clearly contradicted by the precedent and practice of Congress and this Court.

Conspicuously absent from their brief: any defense of opposite-sex marriage. And any discussion of the Fourteenth Amendment or its Equal Protection Clause [or the Fifth Amendment component] (and that clause’s possible impact on a Congressional definition.)

h/t Kathleen for this filing as always

Windsor: Amicus Brief National Organization of Marriage by EqualityCaseFiles

2 Comments Leave a Comment

  • 1. bhgybyvret  |  March 16, 2013 at 11:06 am

    I know that the majority of the site people have no doubt about the power of an important social internet marketing promotional event. Also, plenty of people have no doubt about the fact which will advertising and promotion by means of social media could skyrocket website rankings and even boost your on the net occurrence. Everything that the majority of the web have no idea will be -how they can ” tame ” the power of social media with their little firmrrrs advantage. These are some recommendations which sometimes aid you in ones own social internet marketing undertakings. The most important thing to consider with regards to social internet marketing is that you simply want to create a useful and even completely original unique user generated content. It is a style of written information what individuals would like to show to the acquaintances and even supporters on the community single pages. Build written information which can be insightful and even intriguing, usually nobody would like to share the application. Useful written information search engine optimisation sydney is going to get a persons vision of your respective supporters and even friends. They’re going to probably choose to share the idea, that should build up your likelihood to obtain additional supporters and even customers. Abandon room just with respect to research and even faults in your own social media marketing, particularly in the commencement. Await what on earth is and what’s not working. Experiment all kinds of things. Cause changes since needed. A thing that powerful just with respect to many several other sorts of corporations won’t work for you. You need to learn on ones own research and even issues. When using these promotional, maybe you have to modify and even recharge ones own focus and even plans consistently. Like this you are likely to remain aim for. Can be found an important various good explanations which may bring ones own advertising and promotion decrease unforeseen tactics. It’s the same best to re-evaluate any way it is going consistently. Undertake it often. Look at your strategies and see the one that is the most thriving. xrtiu6fd8gf

  • 2. www.bayareashodokan.org  |  March 16, 2013 at 12:50 pm

    I am certain almost all blog site visitors may have learned the effectiveness of an important email marketing promotional event. Additionally, plenty of people may have learned the fact which will internet online selling by way of social media will boost webpage positioning and strengthen your on-line existence. What almost all internet users need ideas of is certainly -how they may control the effectiveness of social media thus on their modest organisationrrrs advantage. Mentioned are some hints which can aid you in ones email marketing projects. It is important to remember on the subject of email marketing is that you simply want to create a fun and unique content. It’s a sort of content what people should take time to give its acquaintances and supporters on societal background. Make content that could be informative and interesting, or else not a soul should take time to present it all. Interesting content http://www.cloudcontessa.com is going to commute the interest of your fanatics and friends. They may in all probability choose to present this, that is certain to increase your probabilities to obtain additional supporters and prospects. Get away from room when it comes to samples and problems withwith your social media effort, a great the commencement. Loose time waiting for what’s and what’s no longer working. Evaluation almost anything. Earn modifications seeing that needed. Something which useful when it comes to other firms might not be right for you. You should learn on ones samples and blunders. When making use of this type of promoting, possibly you have to and charge ones target and plans fairly often. Like that you can expect to remain on targeted. Are present an important numerous reasons that can carry ones internet online selling lower unusual options. So it is better to re-evaluate the actual course it is going fairly often. Practice it on a regular basis. Look at your campaigns to see what sort is considered the most effective. xrtiu6fd8gf

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required), (Hidden)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL  |  RSS feed for comments on this post.

Having technical problems? E-mail equalityontrial AT couragecampaign DOT org for assistance!