<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cooper-Harris v. USA: In military servicemember&#8217;s challenge to Section 3 of DOMA, House Republicans request hearing via telephone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:33:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prop 8 Trial Tracker &#187; Federal judge reschedules hearing in Cooper-Harris v. USA, a military servicemember&#8217;s challenge to Section 3 of DOMA</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317545</link>
		<dc:creator>Prop 8 Trial Tracker &#187; Federal judge reschedules hearing in Cooper-Harris v. USA, a military servicemember&#8217;s challenge to Section 3 of DOMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Department dropped its defense, asked the judge in Cooper-Harris v. USA if its lawyers could appear at a scheduled December 10 hearing via telephone instead of in person. The hearing was to take place across the country &#8211; attorney Paul [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Department dropped its defense, asked the judge in Cooper-Harris v. USA if its lawyers could appear at a scheduled December 10 hearing via telephone instead of in person. The hearing was to take place across the country &#8211; attorney Paul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight Dave</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317195</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you were very incorrect. They only supported the military to the extent that they were happy to waste taxpayer dollars to fund a bloated weapons industry and buying stuff even the Pentagon considered unnecessary and wasteful. 
 
When it came to the individual troops, they couldn&#039;t care less.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you were very incorrect. They only supported the military to the extent that they were happy to waste taxpayer dollars to fund a bloated weapons industry and buying stuff even the Pentagon considered unnecessary and wasteful. </p>
<p>When it came to the individual troops, they couldn&#039;t care less.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Baltimore</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Baltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 06:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this an indication that BLAG and their hired guns are starting to have money troubles, and are cutting expenses? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this an indication that BLAG and their hired guns are starting to have money troubles, and are cutting expenses? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonyGrl</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317112</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonyGrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting... conserve resources or, perhaps, hide the person with MS, thereby removing an element that might stir compassion for their opponents? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; conserve resources or, perhaps, hide the person with MS, thereby removing an element that might stir compassion for their opponents? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal_Dave</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317107</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal_Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they really want to &quot;conserve litigation resources,&quot;  BLAG , who has &quot;stepped in to intervene in defense of the law&quot; could just step out.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they really want to &quot;conserve litigation resources,&quot;  BLAG , who has &quot;stepped in to intervene in defense of the law&quot; could just step out.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWG</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317079</link>
		<dc:creator>RWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I honestly do not know how the Republican legislators can sleep at night, doesn&#039;t their consciousess ever bother them? &quot; 
 
You&#039;re assuming, of course, that they have a conscience? It&#039;s easy to write off the suffering of others when you view,  as does the typical GOP drone, gay people as less than human. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I honestly do not know how the Republican legislators can sleep at night, doesn&#039;t their consciousess ever bother them? &quot; </p>
<p>You&#039;re assuming, of course, that they have a conscience? It&#039;s easy to write off the suffering of others when you view,  as does the typical GOP drone, gay people as less than human. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure the court will look favorably on the arguments from the lawyer that couldn&#039;t even bother to show up in court that day. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure the court will look favorably on the arguments from the lawyer that couldn&#039;t even bother to show up in court that day. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Baltimore</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317022</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Baltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always thought the GOTP was the &#039;party who most supported the military, no matter what.&#039; 
 
Guess I was incorrect when I thought that. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the GOTP was the &#039;party who most supported the military, no matter what.&#039; </p>
<p>Guess I was incorrect when I thought that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317021</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same way Windsor appealed her victory? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same way Windsor appealed her victory? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/12/05/cooper-harris-v-usa-in-military-servicemembers-challenge-to-section-3-of-doma-house-republicans-request-hearing-via-telephone/#comment-317016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=22190#comment-317016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the Justices are particularly excited about taking any of these marriage cases, much less the Nevada case that hasn&#039;t come up through the circuit. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think the Justices are particularly excited about taking any of these marriage cases, much less the Nevada case that hasn&#039;t come up through the circuit. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
