Sign Up to Receive Email Action Alerts From Issa Exposed
×

Washington’s anti-marriage equality group concedes Referendum 74 vote

November 9, 2012

Marriage equality

By Jacob Combs

Preserve Marriage Washington, the anti-marriage equality group that led the campaign against Washington’s Referendum 74, conceded yesterday that it had lost the vote on the measure in Tuesday’s election, the AP reported last night.  With about 75 percent of precincts reporting, Referendum 74 looks like it will be approved with about 53 percent of the vote, a similar measure to the results for Maine’s Question 1.  Washington United for Marriage, the state’s pro-equality group, declared victory on Wednesday.

With Tuesday’s four marriage equality measures all but settled, one in five same-sex couples now live in a state where they can marry, according to the Williams Institute.  (Adding just California, by the way, would almost double that number to 35 percent.)  But just because Referendum 74 and Questions 1 and 6 passed on Tuesday, couples in Washington, Maine and Maryland won’t be ringing the wedding bells right away.  Via the Human Rights Campaign, here’s a state-by-state rundown of when couples in the three states will finally be allowed to wed.

  • In Washington, Referendum 74′s passage means the state’s marriage law will take effect on December 6, when marriage licenses will be available at the county level.  Washington’s marriage law will recognize out-of-state marriages between same-sex couples, so there is no need for couples married in other jurisdictions to ‘re-marry’ in the state or register their marriage.  The state’s domestic partnerships, which grant the rights but not the title of marriage, will automatically convert to marriages on June 30, 2014, unless they are dissolved beforehand.  Domestic partnerships will continue to be allowed for couples in which one member is over the age of 62.
  • Maryland’s marriage equality law will take effect on January 1, 2013, at which point marriage licensees will be made available.  As in Washington, couples married in other jurisdictions will not need to ‘re-marry’ or register in Maryland, due to a 2010 advisory opinion by the state Attorney General recognizing out-of-state marriages.
  • In Maine, Question 1′s marriage law will go into effect 30 days after the governor ‘proclaims’ Tuesday’s election results.  That can only occur after all the ballots are officially counted, so it is unclear right now when the exact date of enactment will be, although it will very likely be before the end of the year.  We’ll post here at P8TT when we have an exact date.  Maine will continue to offer domestic partnerships will limited rights, but they will not be automatically converted into marriages.  These domestic partnerships will end, however, when either one of the registered partners enters a marriage (including one between both partners).
  • In Minnesota, Amendment 1′s defeat has no impact on the state law prohibiting marriage equality.

In other marriage equality news, French President Francois Hollande’s cabinet is pushing a bill that would bring equal marriage rights to the country next year, despite growing opposition from French conservatives:

The French leader’s top ministers approved the bill legalizing marriage and adoption for same-sex couples, sending it to the legislature for debate, only one day after two American states, Maine and Maryland, became the first in the U.S. to approve same-sex marriage in a popular vote.

Polls show a majority of French support gay marriage, but it has divided the country’s left and right, with lawmakers from the conservative UMP denouncing the Cabinet approval Wednesday.

Also this week, on Tuesday, Spain’s highest court upheld the country’s marriage equality law in a seven-year old lawsuit filed by the conservative Popular Party:

On Tuesday, Spain’s Constitutional Court upheld the legality of the country’s gay marriage law, which was approved in 2005 when the country’s parliament was Socialist controlled.

The court rejected an appeal contending that marriage in the constitution means only the union of a man and woman. The county’s top court voted 8-3 to dismiss the appeal filed by the conservative Popular Party.

The Popular Party took power late last year after the Socialists were ousted over their handling of the country’s economic crisis.

9 Comments Leave a Comment

  • 1. sfbob  |  November 9, 2012 at 8:44 am

    Given Governor LePage's views on marriage equality, and on gay rights in general, it should be rather amusing to have him proclaim our equality in the State of Maine

  • 2. Seth from Maryland  |  November 9, 2012 at 8:53 am

    lol :)

  • 3. Seth from Maryland  |  November 9, 2012 at 9:08 am

    however, one important note to point out in Minnesota, the legislature is now flipped to dems control, with this vote in our favor , Governor Dayton is a strong supporter of marriage equality, so it may not be right away ,but marriage equality may soon legal there

  • 4. _BK_  |  November 9, 2012 at 10:00 am

    Let's build on this momentum. I'd love to see Rhode Island, New Jersey, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesota, and Delaware on board by the end of 2014. California will come soon enough; just gotta wait out the court battles.

  • 5. Anthony  |  November 9, 2012 at 10:30 am

    Especially now with all the victories, I'm pretty sure the court will deny cert later this month, meaning full legal marriage back in CA!

  • 6. Thom Watson  |  November 9, 2012 at 11:13 am

    Note that the dates provided in the post are not the first dates that same-sex couples actually will be able to marry, but the dates the law takes effect. In Washington, there's a three-day waiting period after getting a license, so couples will be able to start getting licenses on the 6th, but not be able to start marrying until three days later. In Maryland, the law takes effect on January 1, but that's a holiday, so licenses won't be available until the 2nd. Maryland has a two-day waiting period after the license, so marriages would be able to start on the 4th. Maine has no waiting period, but as you note there's a broad range within the law for when those marriages could begin. ANd it is interesting to note that marriages in California potentially could begin again before any of these three.

  • 7. davep  |  November 9, 2012 at 11:28 am

    Everyone who attends that press conference should set their ring tone to "sad trombone" and set them all off at the appropriate moment….

  • 8. Pat  |  November 9, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    "Domestic partnerships will continue to be allowed for couples in which one member is over the age of 62."
    That seems pretty odd to me. Is there any specific reason for this weird rule?

  • 9. PDx_Str8_Supporter  |  November 9, 2012 at 2:31 pm

    Social security and medicare benefits could be threatened if a 62+ individual enters into a civil marriage, but not effected in the case of a D.P.

Leave a Comment

(required)

(required), (Hidden)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

TrackBack URL  |  RSS feed for comments on this post.

Having technical problems? E-mail equalityontrial AT couragecampaign DOT org for assistance!