<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Defense of Marriage&#8221; Strikes Out Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reformed</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289694</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I see, it is good to see that it is no longer a &quot;9th circuit thing&quot;.  A wide distribution of type of cases as well, including bankruptcy protection, which is a very important part of the modern business landscape. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I see, it is good to see that it is no longer a &quot;9th circuit thing&quot;.  A wide distribution of type of cases as well, including bankruptcy protection, which is a very important part of the modern business landscape. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marriage Equalty: Three News Items That Are Way More Important Than Chicken Sandwiches &#171; Family Scholars</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289644</link>
		<dc:creator>Marriage Equalty: Three News Items That Are Way More Important Than Chicken Sandwiches &#171; Family Scholars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February, five different courts have ruled that section three of the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. In two [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February, five different courts have ruled that section three of the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. In two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Baltimore</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289637</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Baltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You said, &quot;It really can no longer be said that is just a 9th circuit or California thing.&quot; 
 
And when I responded with &quot;9th Circuit, 1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 6th Circuit (in a related case)&quot;, I was showing that it is not just a 9th circuit or California thing. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said, &quot;It really can no longer be said that is just a 9th circuit or California thing.&quot; </p>
<p>And when I responded with &quot;9th Circuit, 1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 6th Circuit (in a related case)&quot;, I was showing that it is not just a 9th circuit or California thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reformed</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289635</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t figure that one out, but it&#039;s late, maybe in the morning I will get it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#039;t figure that one out, but it&#039;s late, maybe in the morning I will get it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Baltimore</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Baltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9th Circuit, 1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 6th Circuit (in a related case). 
 
Nope, don&#039;t see a pattern that it&#039;s spread beyond California. 
 
VBG ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9th Circuit, 1st Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 6th Circuit (in a related case). </p>
<p>Nope, don&#039;t see a pattern that it&#039;s spread beyond California. </p>
<p>VBG </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reformed</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/08/06/defense-of-marriage-strikes-out-again/#comment-289629</link>
		<dc:creator>Reformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 04:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=19857#comment-289629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the unending string of court victories, I am inclined to say let them eat chicken.  Particularly encouraged with the distribution of courts.  It really can no longer be said that is just a 9th circuit or California thing.  It would be egregious anti gay bias I&#039;d the supreme court could uphold pornography, WBC funeral protests, and all kinds of things that are accommodated in the preservation of liberty, and then crush this string of lower court rulings just so that people who wish to be married cannot.  Surely the court will recognize that after all the things that have led to the state of marriage being what it is, it wasn&#039;t until same sex couples wanted to participate that &quot;national&quot; organizations were formed to &quot;protect&quot; it.  As with hate crimes . . . no such thing when it is proposed to include anti gay crime.  So telling when the opposition holds to a book that promotes &quot;putting to death&quot;.  How can they go against it.  Ok rambling now.  Sorry. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the unending string of court victories, I am inclined to say let them eat chicken.  Particularly encouraged with the distribution of courts.  It really can no longer be said that is just a 9th circuit or California thing.  It would be egregious anti gay bias I&#039;d the supreme court could uphold pornography, WBC funeral protests, and all kinds of things that are accommodated in the preservation of liberty, and then crush this string of lower court rulings just so that people who wish to be married cannot.  Surely the court will recognize that after all the things that have led to the state of marriage being what it is, it wasn&#039;t until same sex couples wanted to participate that &quot;national&quot; organizations were formed to &quot;protect&quot; it.  As with hate crimes . . . no such thing when it is proposed to include anti gay crime.  So telling when the opposition holds to a book that promotes &quot;putting to death&quot;.  How can they go against it.  Ok rambling now.  Sorry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
