<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina: Prop 8 backers Alliance Defense Fund responsible for anti-gay Amendment 1&#8242;s broad language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equalityontrial.com/2012/05/07/north-carolina-prop-8-backers-responsible-for-anti-gay-amendment-1s-broad-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/05/07/north-carolina-prop-8-backers-responsible-for-anti-gay-amendment-1s-broad-language/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=north-carolina-prop-8-backers-responsible-for-anti-gay-amendment-1s-broad-language</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagesse</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/05/07/north-carolina-prop-8-backers-responsible-for-anti-gay-amendment-1s-broad-language/#comment-279563</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=17438#comment-279563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Stam, the Raleigh lawmaker, said he wanted a more narrowly worded amendment but was &#8220;overruled&#8221; by &#8220;national experts&#8221; he identified as the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal advocacy group.&quot; 
 
Your elected representatives at work.  Yup... that&#039;s how you decide the rights of the citizens of NC. 
 
It had to come out sometime... who exactly drafted this language and what they meant by it.  So Stam just happens to be chatting up a reporter, a couple of days before the vote... and this is what he comes up with?  Depraved incompetent loon! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Stam, the Raleigh lawmaker, said he wanted a more narrowly worded amendment but was &ldquo;overruled&rdquo; by &ldquo;national experts&rdquo; he identified as the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal advocacy group.&quot; </p>
<p>Your elected representatives at work.  Yup&#8230; that&#039;s how you decide the rights of the citizens of NC. </p>
<p>It had to come out sometime&#8230; who exactly drafted this language and what they meant by it.  So Stam just happens to be chatting up a reporter, a couple of days before the vote&#8230; and this is what he comes up with?  Depraved incompetent loon! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pal</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2012/05/07/north-carolina-prop-8-backers-responsible-for-anti-gay-amendment-1s-broad-language/#comment-279548</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/?p=17438#comment-279548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting article, but it seems to go against the generally accepted rule that if voters are confused about a ballot proposition they will usually vote no on it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting article, but it seems to go against the generally accepted rule that if voters are confused about a ballot proposition they will usually vote no on it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
