<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging Day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=liveblogging-day-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: labor day weekend 2011</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-235452</link>
		<dc:creator>labor day weekend 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 02:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-235452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Blog Browser...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog Browser&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn locksmith</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-234900</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn locksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 16:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-234900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;1.) What do you think...&lt;/strong&gt;

2.) [...]it would be cool if you took a look at this site. It has some good information on it[......]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1.) What do you think&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>2.) [...]it would be cool if you took a look at this site. It has some good information on it[......]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Men, Women, and Money - A Man&#8217;s View &#124; Strollerderby</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194606</link>
		<dc:creator>Men, Women, and Money - A Man&#8217;s View &#124; Strollerderby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Trumbull Professor of American History at Harvard University and an expert on Marriage, was testifying in the federal case on the constitutionality of California&#8217;s proposition 8 on Tuesday.  She went on to say that [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trumbull Professor of American History at Harvard University and an expert on Marriage, was testifying in the federal case on the constitutionality of California&#8217;s proposition 8 on Tuesday.  She went on to say that [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APOLARITY &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Proposition 8 Trial</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194605</link>
		<dc:creator>APOLARITY &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Proposition 8 Trial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the evolution of &#8220;the institution of marriage&#8221;. A sample, from the liveblogging at Prop 8 Trial Tracker:  [In the early 20th century] Marriage fell into the common law view of “coverture” which was [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the evolution of &#8220;the institution of marriage&#8221;. A sample, from the liveblogging at Prop 8 Trial Tracker:  [In the early 20th century] Marriage fell into the common law view of “coverture” which was [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balu</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194601</link>
		<dc:creator>Balu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much... You are doing a wonderful job covering this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much&#8230; You are doing a wonderful job covering this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194604</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is so ridiculous that they are trying to argue that one of the reasons for marriage is procreation. What about straight couples who decide not or CAN&#039;T have children? 
 
Just because you refuse to legalize gay marriage, is not going to keep people from being homosexual, and is certainly not going to make people who are homosexual, &quot;decide&quot; to be straight so they can procreate and get married. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is so ridiculous that they are trying to argue that one of the reasons for marriage is procreation. What about straight couples who decide not or CAN&#039;T have children? </p>
<p>Just because you refuse to legalize gay marriage, is not going to keep people from being homosexual, and is certainly not going to make people who are homosexual, &quot;decide&quot; to be straight so they can procreate and get married. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Ohara</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194603</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ohara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So should couples who don&#039;t plan to have children just NOT MARRY  since that is the supposed &quot;main purpose&quot; of marriage?      How ridiculous.  Whether a couple has or doesn&#039;t have children is irrelevant, IMHO, where marriage is concerned.       
I do not identify as gay, but I wholly support marriage equality and the need to STOP discriminating against people for whatever reason.  Two people who love each other and are in a committed relationship should have the right to get married in this country.    It&#039;s time that the discrimination stops and the walls of hate and bigotry come down ALL OVER THIS NATION for good.     
This state by state crap needs to stop and the US Supreme Court needs to rule that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So should couples who don&#039;t plan to have children just NOT MARRY  since that is the supposed &quot;main purpose&quot; of marriage?      How ridiculous.  Whether a couple has or doesn&#039;t have children is irrelevant, IMHO, where marriage is concerned.<br />
I do not identify as gay, but I wholly support marriage equality and the need to STOP discriminating against people for whatever reason.  Two people who love each other and are in a committed relationship should have the right to get married in this country.    It&#039;s time that the discrimination stops and the walls of hate and bigotry come down ALL OVER THIS NATION for good.<br />
This state by state crap needs to stop and the US Supreme Court needs to rule that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194600</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for live bloggin!   Prayers for YouTube!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for live bloggin!   Prayers for YouTube!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All your offspring are belong to us. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All your offspring are belong to us. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster&#039;s Ink</title>
		<link>http://equalityontrial.com/2010/01/12/liveblogging-day-2/#comment-194596</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster&#039;s Ink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prop8trialtracker.com/?p=190#comment-194596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Won&#8217;t someone please think of the&#160;children!...&lt;/strong&gt;

The battle over Prop 8 has gone to court in California, and the defense is proceeding with the usual arguments about how marriage is all about procreation. It seems we can&#8217;t discuss marriage equality in the U.S. without hearing that marriage is a...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Won&#8217;t someone please think of the&nbsp;children!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The battle over Prop 8 has gone to court in California, and the defense is proceeding with the usual arguments about how marriage is all about procreation. It seems we can&#8217;t discuss marriage equality in the U.S. without hearing that marriage is a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
